The Movie Press
  • Movie Reviews
  • Twitter News/Updates
  • News & Notes
  • DVD
  • Box Office Results
  • Contact
  • About Us

“The Fifth Estate" weighs the good and the bad of Julian Assange, Wikileaks

10/18/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Fifth Estate, which sadly is not related to The Fifth Element, is a journalistic thriller about Wikileaks and the ivory-haired Aussie activist behind it, Julian Assange. (For those keeping track of estates, that’s: [1] clergy, [2] nobility, [3] commoners, and [4] press; and [5] blogs, or to focus on a particular site with a slightly more lofty goal than click-bait headlines and animated GIFs, Wikileaks.)

In case you’ve just come to from a three-year hibernation, Wikileaks is a site designed to provide anonymity to whistleblowers — a rag-tag, barebones website bent on speaking truth to power through the release of unedited documents damning the corrupt. The release of unedited documents is the main focus of the drama here. 

And that unedited bit is important. After all, “editing is a form of bias,” Benedict Cumberbatch’s Assange reminds us, and the idea of complete objectivity in reporting without it is a myth — which is why the rest of this setence has not been edittidd for speling. Truff.

Game of Thrones, the late, great Cousin Matthew, Jason Bourne and more after the jump!

Of course, truth is something rarely found on the shiny screens at your local cineplex, and The Fifth Estate suffers from some of the same issues plaguing many (or most) Hollywood productions based on historical events: It takes liberties with history to please the crowd.

But, even with fudging the details to craft a more tense thriller, it never gets to the greatness of other superior, suspense-soaked whistleblower films like The Insider, The Constant Gardener or Michael Clayton. (That was based on a true story, right? No matter...) There’s enough missing and altered about this tale of the events that kept Wikileaks in the international spotlight between 2010 and 2011, that it’s best to consider this fiction inspired by actual events rather than based on them.

The things that you’d incorrectly assume from watching The Fifth Estate include, but are not limited to: why Assange has white hair, how un-redacted confidential documents exposing undercover operatives came into the public sphere, and what happened when Assange and one-time Wikileaks spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg have their inevitable fallout.

And there’s an even bigger issue that feels omitted. When you’re touching on a gray area where every single good deed must be weighed against the bad to get anything close to a clear, scientific answer to the question “Is Wikileaks good?”,  it seems a shame to leave off of the “good” scoreboard the possibility that Assange and Co.’s actions may have led to a domino effect that changed the face of the Middle East: Exposing corruption in Tunisia which helped set into motion the Arab Spring.

Some of the Hollywood-ization works and feels less irresponsible. Since we’ve now established there can’t be international suspense unless someone is escaping a hostile territory just moments before the baddies realize their true identity (looking at you, Argo), The Fifth Estate also hops around the globe showing us the effects Assange’s leaks are having on everyone from a D.C. diplomat to an informant in the Middle East. There are some genuinely tense moments here, and it gives the film a Jason Bourne-type espionage flair — with less hand to hand combat and car chases.

There's plenty that The Fifth Estate does well. There's some interesting imagery to take in, including the opening scene's montage of the birth of information from the printed word to the Internet, and a repeated surreal visual of a never-ending newsroom with rows of empty, identical desks set on a snowy field. We also get some minor characters played by some recognizable faces from TV — Downton Abbey's Cousin Matthew (Dan Stevens), the red-headed lady who births out shadow monsters on HBO's Game of Thrones (Carice van Houten), 

At the top of the list of positives: Benedict Cumbertach is lost in the role of Julian Assange. Even those who would shout “Sherlock” upon seeing him on the street rather than calling out his Christian name will find their memories wiped of the man behind the character. 

Cumberbatch’s Assange is fascinating and flawed. He's manipulative with a massive ego, but you can kind of feel for the guy. This is a man who has left the normal world behind — clocking out permanently and sentencing himself to a life on the run from CIA spooks and thugs with foreign powers that would love to see his mouthpiece silenced. But even when he's a prick, he remains a man of strong convictions — right or wrong. He realizes many want to make the world a better place but oh so few are willing to sacrifice their comfort to achieve the causes they claim to hold dear.

The ending of The Fifth Estate gets weak (at one point they actually use the name of the movie in the movie — I was cringing in anticipation feeling it coming) but then things turn around with a funny, quite unexpected twist in the final minutes before credits roll.

Overall, if you can overlook the factual issues, this semi-fictional version of recent events can be a springboard for some heated J-school debate on the idea of morals and traditional journalism versus the kind of complete and utter transparency of the Internet age. Is it wrong to release information that may endanger the lives of some if it will expose corruption from those in power? It's a tough question to answer, and the longest lasting takeaway from this passable, though somewhat forgettable thriller.

--Eric Pulsifer
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    October 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008

    Categories

    All
    Austin Film Festival
    Darcie Duttweiler Reviews
    Derrick Mitcham Reviews
    Eric Harrelson Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Fantastic Fest
    Greg Maclennan Reviews
    Greg Wilson Reviews
    Jessica Hixson Reviews
    Mark Collins Reviews
    Monte Monreal Reviews
    Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Sxsw

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.