The Movie Press
  • Movie Reviews
  • Twitter News/Updates
  • News & Notes
  • DVD
  • Box Office Results
  • Contact
  • About Us

Wild horses: A four-year-old's take on "My Little Pony: The Movie"

10/5/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Today, in theaters around the world, fans will return to a revered, unforgettable universe that holds a special place in the hearts of millions—a visionary universe created in the early ’80s but brought back to the big screen today, facing at least some skepticism. Can a new, perhaps uncalled for, entry in the series live up to fans’ impossibly high expectations? Is it yet another in a never-ending line of nostalgia-powered cash grabs?

To find out, I took my four-year-old daughter to watch today’s other big new release, My Little Pony: The Movie. What follows is our conversation about the movie over a couple bowls of cereal.

Spoiler warning: Turns out children don’t understand the concept of spoilers, so tread cautiously if you don’t want to hear one key (though totally obvious if you’ve seen a trailer or have even the faintest familiarity with the world of Equestria) plot point from the final bit of the movie.

What was your favorite part of My Little Pony: The Movie?
Well... all of it.

Fair. Not sure what else I could have expected. Who was your favorite character?
All of the ponies. Oh! Except for Tempest… Except for Tempest. I only like the nice ponies. Tempest is a bad guy. She wants to take the good ponies' magic, but then she gets friendly by Twilight [as in Twilight Sparkle, the series' purple protagonist a.k.a. the Princess of Friendship] and Twilight teaches her a lesson.

Wow. Spoilers, kiddo.
What?

Never mind. So, Tempest Shadow is a new pony voiced by Emily Blunt. She’s cynical on the whole “friendship is magic” bit, which is basically the 24/7 focus for the Mane Six, the six key ponies of MLP. This, and the fact that she wants to steal the pony princesses’ powers for her own evil purposes, puts them at odds. The bulk of the story is Tempest pursuing Twilight and her friends, which results in some tense close calls. Did you think it was scary? Is it too scary for little kids?
No. It was so funny. I was just like staring at it.

You were entranced by the screen. I tried to give you some popcorn—I even put some in your hand--and you just let it fall out to the floor
I was like… I couldn’t see you. I didn’t want to miss any part—sorry. Maybe next time when we go to another Pony movie can you pleasssse give me popcorn and I promise I’ll remember to eat it?
​

Read More
0 Comments

“Blade Runner 2049”: The Return of Cyberpunk

10/5/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Good cyberpunk is hard to find. A true cyberpunk movie comes around only once or twice a decade. Sure, there are plenty of science fiction movies every year, but they are typically pristine action movies in which an explosion happens every 20 minutes. What makes for “good” cyberpunk is dystopia plus philosophy with a little hard boiled detective story added in for flair. In this sense, Blade Runner 2049 hits its mark.

Like the title suggests, the story picks up 30 years after the events of the first film. Ryan Gosling is K, a Blade Runner for the LAPD, meaning his job, like Deckard’s (Harrison Ford) in the first film, is to hunt down and “retire” AWOL synthetic humans (called replicants), who are used in society as a slave or servant class. What follows is a slow-burning detective film, as the case he’s on turns out to one that could shake the pillars that society is built on.

Gosling portrays his character with the emotional range of a body scanner at an airport. But, considering that is basically the role of the character, he can’t really be blamed. K is a cog of a machine in a world built around functionality—not beauty. He is a man with one job, who doesn’t have time to marvel at the holographic advertisements and bizarre-yet-believable wardrobes of the future. Fans of the original will miss Deckard’s wry wit and subterfuge. His character returns for this film as well, checking off another return for Ford’s iconic characters. Without giving too much away, it’s nice to see that Ford can still throw a punch like the best of them.

Visually the film is a treat to watch. Director Denis Villeneuve knows his source material, giving us just enough glimpses of the architecture and society of the world to pique our interests and remind of us the original without distracting us from the plot. His use of heavy shadows throughout further cements the noir aesthetic, and the way he contrasts nearly monochromatic scenes set in the countryside to those full of flashing images and cool colors of the city keeps the viewers eyes gleeful, even if the action on screen is limited.

The film builds its plot and themes on the same philosophical question that was touched on in the first movie: What makes a human a human? And does that definition make them (us?) superior? As the film progresses, we begin to question the truths given to us in the first act, and our allegiances to the protagonists and antagonists start to waiver. Though the film doesn’t shove its own answers down our throats, it definitely leaves you thinking like a first-year philosophy student as you walk out of the auditorium.

To that end, this is not the end-of-summer sci-fi action flick you have been waiting for. For its 2-hour-and-45-minute runtime, the action is sparse but precisely used. It plays more like a modern noir film than it does a typical science fiction caper. So, if you are looking for a futuristic shoot-em-up, this one might not be your cup of tea.

If, however, you are like me and have been aching for a well-told, slow-burning crime story set in a dystopic future, then
Blade Runner 2049 is the film for you.

​—Spencer Smith



0 Comments

    Archives

    October 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008

    Categories

    All
    Austin Film Festival
    Darcie Duttweiler Reviews
    Derrick Mitcham Reviews
    Eric Harrelson Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Fantastic Fest
    Greg Maclennan Reviews
    Greg Wilson Reviews
    Jessica Hixson Reviews
    Mark Collins Reviews
    Monte Monreal Reviews
    Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Sxsw

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.