The Movie Press
  • Movie Reviews
  • Twitter News/Updates
  • News & Notes
  • DVD
  • Box Office Results
  • Contact
  • About Us

Ballet of brutality: Shut up and go see "John Wick"

10/24/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Like John Wick, I’ll waste nary a moment getting to the point: You can just stop reading right now and go see John Wick. 

You… you’re still here? Did you not want to watch Keanu Reeves beat the living shit out of an endless queue of bad guys, racking up a body count in a revenge fantasy action flick that makes Taken look like Frozen?

Oh, that. You’ve seen one of the more laughable trailers (i.e., “They killed the dog my dead wife gave me...”) and thought it sounded like some sort of joke you’d rather not spend $10 to be the butt of. Like you, my friend, those ads left me with zero desire to see John Wick; I assumed this would be yet another "meh" addition to Keanu's résumé. But, interestingly enough, as silly as the premise seems in chopped and condensed 90-second preview format, when said dog actually does get the boot, it’s a lump-in-your-throat-making punch to the puppy-loving heart, and you’ll be in nodding in eager agreement with the ensuing bone-breaking rampage that follows Wick burying his furry friend.

Growing up on a diet of violent video games, I’ve witnessed some pretty horrific, hilarious and horrific/hilarious scenes of staged savagery, but John Wick still finds ways to shock. It’s not that it's especially gory (though, there are a couple gross bits of brain-splatter and blood that will remind you this is definitely R-rated material) but because it feels so raw. Combatants struggle to strangle and stab as they wrestle in battles that rarely end in a clean neck twist. And even when they do, Wick makes sure the deed is done with a bullet between the eyes. The real reason it all works so well is that the close-quarters combat that makes up the bulk of the action is kept in the frame so clearly. Forget the fast cuts of hard-to-follow hand-to-hand showdowns in the Bourne movies and imagine instead a 100-minute film filled with fight scenes like the gorgeous, stationary shot of that choreographed dance between silhouetted Bond and an assassin in Skyfall — then crank up the brutality.

Directed by a pair of stuntmen Keanu met while doing the Matrix movies, John Wick is largely an excuse to move from one skirmish-filled set piece to the next, and it thankfully wastes little time on backstory, dialog or anything that will require much acting from Keanu. This laser-sight focus on action delivers a one-two barrage of badass moment after badass moment, with a few laugh-out-loud bits sprinkled in to break the teeth-gritting tension and let you catch your breath. It’s a series of adrenaline rushes reminiscent of the “it’s about to go down” giddiness Keanu conjured in his glory days in moment's like Neo’s “We need guns. Lots of guns.”

The shots are dark and skew blue with massive amounts of machismo packed into each frame. When he’s not busting skulls, Keanu looks like he’s stepped out of a cologne ad — in a monotone three-piece suit behind the wheel of a classic muscle car in a fog of man so thick you could choke on it. At any given moment, it seems there’s a stubbled man swirling around a fancy tumbler filled with one dark spirit or another. On the other side of the manliness coin is the unfortunate source of Wick’s rage, a weasel-eyed Russian gangster played by the expertly hatable Alfie Allen, Games of Thrones’ poor prick-less Theon/Reek (and real-life brother of Lily Allen), a mobster's bratty kid who screwed with the wrong dude's dog.

John Wick isn't for everyone. People uncomfortable with theatrical violence should definitely steer clear. But if action is what you seek, John Wick delivers a ballet of brutality bound to make it either a cult classic after it bleeds out in theaters or be the first sign of an impending Keanu renaissance (Keanu-ssance?).

--Eric Pulsifer

1 Comment

Hell hath no "Fury" like war

10/17/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
War is hell. War is a job. Between this oft-repeated dictum and my less noble depiction, Fury finds its place. It’s hard to hold war films to a certain storytelling rubric because no matter how surreal a The Big Red One can get or how glorious a To Hell and Back might be, war—as a narrative—is made of a few guaranteed component parts. It’s why war is easy to teach in school; war has dates, names, and a kind of grandeur in both heroism and tragedy. 

Fury does its best to parse through these many threads knotted around such inhumanity. Predictable realities abut with poetic moments, but as with so much war making, it’s difficult to declare a winner.

Fury is cut from the same cloth as Play Dirty and Band of Brothers. With an open eye cast on the complicated legacy of the Greatest Generation’s Greatest Moment, Fury revels in grit and grime. WWII films used to have a nasty habit of being too tidy in the wake of V-Day, but as the years have peeled back, a more thorough examination of the horrors of war have been taken into account.

Not to say WWII wasn’t a noble charge, or a ‘necessary’ war, but the carnage of any war is only truly known by the participants. Pestilence and death roll through cities and towns, and the immensity of a total war like WWII is impossible to comprehend. Films like Fury and its ilk do their best to capture the brute profundity of it all.

Insomuch, Fury is brutish. Bloodied and disemboweled, the movie never veers too far from the moon like hellscape of bombed out battlefields. Trucks full of dead, medical tents teeming with wounded, the living caked in mud and misery, Fury doesn’t go for the kid glove treatment.

Every bit a David Ayer’s film, Fury further solidifies his credentials as an auteur. Ayer knows atmosphere, and his ability to create an absorbing tone is the picture’s biggest asset. It’s uncanny how often films forget what they are or step outside themselves, but Ayer keeps Fury on the level. A grim, visceral level.

If the story maintained the same discipline, Fury could easily work its way into a different stratum, but horseshoes and hand grenades and mediocrity and whatnot. Fury isn't a mediocre film, but it grades out toward the median. If you could single out the sublime moments, you'd be certain it was a war film of distinction. If you saw a separate version isolating the scenes of abject war movie sameness, you'd think it was a war movie trope awareness video.

Ayer has an uncanny ability to balance lyricism, serenity, and tension in his best scenes. His emptiest moments seem almost adamant in their predictability. The scorecard reflects a split decision, but the true, perplexing tale of the tape is a collection of gripping sequences dragged down by the weight of surrounding banalities.

The strongest and, somewhat unexpected strengths of the film are the acting and, to a greater extent, the relationships. You expect a certain competence from Pitt, but the supporting cast is stellar. Shia LaBeouf gives an understated, thoughtful turn as the Christ-loving gunner Bible. Michael Pena, who never strays too far from himself, brings his frank and glib candor to Gordo.

My favorite individual performance goes to Jon Bernthal of Walking Dead fame. Where his range seems limited, perhaps due to typecasting, he fully illuminates every crag of the beastly Grady Travis. Fragile, ugly, cruel, traumatized, Bernthal travels the length from snarl to whisper. Another great character who might get overlooked is Fury, the tank. An actual WWII Tiger tank, its role as womb and warrior creates it’s own unique connection with the audience. 

The relationships in war films typically skew towards brothers-in-arms. Fury certainly emphasizes the intimacy and shared experiences of these soldiers, but also highlights that war is very much an occupation. You don’t always choose your coworkers, and you certainly don’t have to like them, but the power of a common goal creates it’s own gravity. Especially when the common goal is nothing more or less solipsistic than survival. And where their rallying cry could be a cry of brotherhood, America, or liberty, instead they opt for the simple refrain, “best job I ever had.”

Fury, as a whole, doesn’t do enough to distinguish itself from other well made WWII films. But when celebrated for its triumphs, elevated pockets of chaos and beauty alike, Fury merits a conversation. As the tagline reads, “War never ends quietly.” Fury’s successes lie in the quiet moments, those unexpected bits where humanity stumbles into the gaping chasm left by the horrors of war.

—Monte Monreal

0 Comments

Pale, Boring Dot

10/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
I liked Juno. I did. I also liked Young Adult. I thought both gave us compelling stories about likable characters in relatable situations. I was hoping to get more of the same from Men, Women and Children. Jason Reitman is a capable director, and I am always interested to see what he does. I'm usually happy with the results.

This film follows a group of high school teenagers and their parents struggling with the minutia of their own lives and how the pervasiveness of various social media affects them. It is clear early on that the attitude towards social media and the accessibility of the Internet, in general, is primarily negative. There is little to no positive interaction between characters that happens online. A running theme through the film is the comparison of humanity's cosmic insignificance and how social networking is so incredibly selfish and egocentric.

The film opens with a shot of the Voyager I craft floating out in space and an explanation of the craft and its mission, showing the picture of earth that Voyager took right as it left the solar system in 1990 entitled Pale Blue Dot. A YouTube clip of Carl Sagan's reflections on the photo also titled Pale Blue Dot is discovered by one of the characters after his mother abruptly leaves him and his father for California and a new life. The emotionally distraught teenager latches onto the video's nihilistic undertone.

On the other side of that, one of the characters is an incredibly self-involved teenage girl who, with the help of her mother, has a “modeling” website dedicated to just pictures of her in marginally provocative poses. The film succeeds in showing us that we should all take a step back from our Facebook,Twitter etc., and stop to realize that we as individuals are not the most important things in the universe. Score one for Nietzsche!

While the message is clear (internet: BAD!), the film tries to show us all of the new problems that the internet has caused, but ends up just showing us new spins on old favorites. Infidelity existed before Ashley Madison.com. Parents were overbearing before keystroke counters, history searches and GPS phone tracking. Teenagers hated their bodies before anorexia encouragement sites. There were asshole dudes before text snubbing. Parents made some questionable decisions in the name of helping their children before modeling websites. I kept thinking it was Fast Times at Ridgemont High but with the Internets!

With only about two likable characters in the movie and meandering plot threads that just kind of bump into one another, this film feels self-indulgent and a little messy. Attempting to split the focus on so many characters can be difficult. Here, it results in a number of unremarkable and underdeveloped stories that don't deliver on their own and, unfortunately, don't come together to form a cohesive narrative.

To be fair, though, the film is adapted from the novel of the same name by Chad Kultgen, and as everyone is well aware, the detail and complexity of a novel is quite difficult to replicate on film. Having not read the book itself I can't possibly pretend to know how the movie and book line up, but I felt it deserved a mention.

But, that is not to say I give Men, Women and Children a pass; it still failed to hold my interest in all but one character's story. It felt bloated and plodding, never giving enough attention to any one character at a time. What we end up with is a film that is like a giant bowl of oatmeal with only half a dozen blueberries. Sure, the blueberries are in there, but there is just far too few of them to make the oatmeal enjoyable.

—Eric Harrelson

0 Comments

De Facto Downey

10/10/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Judge is locked in a furious internal battle. It’s not an unredeemable film, but it is a terribly confused, meager film. There are notable moments, even good moments, but they are obscured in a cage of exhausted tropes and sentimentality. Like a premise Frankenstein, The Judge lumbers around trying to carry the burden of not one, but three tired stories. Each as stale as the last—the prodigal son, the death of a parent, and…wait for it…a murder trial—the film fails to even have fun with this hydra like exercise in routine. At the center of it all is Robert Downey Jr, and try as he might, even his concerted effort couldn’t lift this picture above its mess of flaws.

This is most certainly Downey’s film to carry, but not in a complimentary way. It’s as though Downey was the only one unaware this was roughly a 45% effort kind of shoot, and his 100% just seems…out of place. Not to denigrate the fine performances by Robert Duval and Vincent D’Onofrio, but everyone seems to clear the way for Downey. And watching so much talent line the gangway while RDJ struts about at full crank is not flattering. Not to the film, nor to Downey's wealth of talents. He goes all in, you can’t deny it, but to overplay such a putrid hand is less noble than it is self-indulgent.

Enough fault cannot be levied against the lackluster screenplay at the root of this film. Downey plays Hank Palmer, and where this may sound incredulous, Palmer is a white hot, sharp tongued, and morally ambiguous defense attorney. You seen this? You head about this? Hank Palmer lives in The City, a bad place where cheating wives live, but he is quickly called to his long forgotten home in The Country. 

You can tell The Country is inherently good because the music is brighter and white kids hold fishing poles. But this is a sad trip because Mom is dead, and Estranged Father is a jerk who never quite ‘got’ his renegade son. Did we mention Estranged Father is a judge? Get it? 

Oh, and Hank’s high school sweetheart, jilted when he turned tail to never return, still works at the local diner. No you’re not unconscious. No, you didn’t hallucinate this premise that reads like a ransom note cut from other mediocre film summaries. This is the effort of four (yup, one, two three, and four) screenwriters who must be convinced you’ve never seen a movie before.

David Dobkin’s direction is wildly inconsistent in every facet of production. Hop scotching from serio-dramedy to procedural to stark realism, none of these concepts are allowed to flourish in the face of such tonal inconsistency. Dobkin will give some moments the soft lens treatment and then counter with a scene where Dax Shepard blows chunks. No innuendo here, we get the full spray multiple times. This isn’t to say these things can’t be in the same film, but there was never solidified feeling enough to prop up these varied elements. Instead, The Judge is cluttered and uneven, but this hackneyed monster does shamble into a fine moment or two.

After testing you for 25 straight minutes, the film’s central arc, a murder mystery, emerges with some vigor. There are few pleasant moments with Downey and Emma Trembaly, the actress cast as Palmer's (precocious, duh) daughter Lauren. Dax Shepherd brings some levity, there are a few Downey/Duval sparks sprayed from the screen, and we're even treated to a Billy Bob Thornton sighting. But The Judge has one superb moment all to itself. As unflinching a portrayal of an ill parent as I’ve seen, an authentic experience works its way onto the screen. It’s only a moment, but it was honest, a trait conspicuously missing from the film.

There is some talk of legacies in The Judge. Duval’s is intact and Downey still has some crowning achievements in store for us, I’m sure of it. But the question of a Downey in full in a post Iron Man world is growing hazy. Since he donned the candy chrome super suit, his non-Marvel Universe films have been forgettable at best, and detestable at worst. It's tricky to navigate the waters away from and icon, but Downey's biggest Iron Man asset was he was only having to play himself.

Where I once adored his films for being an emblem of exactly where Downey was at that exact moment in his life, perhaps the dirty secret is he can't play anyone but himself. And maybe it's just me, but I don't need another film about rich, attractive assholes learning trite lessons. Because if the Downey as Downey theory holds, the lessons become interchangeable, and the rich asshole emerges as the legacy.


—Monte Monreal

0 Comments

All Things Equal

10/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
In keeping with The Equalizer’s grim efficiency I’ll keep it short and sweet. The sort of review you could look at your watch beforehand, say “16 seconds,” and know you’ve gotten to the meat of the matter: It’s good. It’s brutal.

Though not particularly sophisticated, The Equalizer is heady—and downright delicious—in its ability to plumb the depths of knowing exactly what it is. Has Denzel played this riff 13 times before? Duh. Are we watching yet another iteration of the lone, just-ish man a la Yojimbo, Death Wish, or Neesons given your particular era? Uh…that’s kind of the best part. Should you care about this film? Well, no one’s asking you to start a charity for the damn thing. All The Equalizer asks of you is to cozy up with your favorite corkscrew and let a movie so good at being a movie just be a movie.

The most commendable part of the film is the element most readily apparent, Denzel Washington. Denzel saunters through this picture like a Bengal Tiger stalking around his supplicants. His acting, though nothing outside of his ken, vibrates with tuning fork like perfection and consistency. Playing a character who’s not so much a Robert as a Mr. McCall, he’s a deadly man conspicuously hiding in the cage/façade of ‘regular’ life. Part guidance counselor, part lonely widower, part unknowable man, it’s the best version of Denzel Denzel has played in a while. 

Never once does this film set itself up to be something it’s not, or should even aspire to be. Equalizer, fittingly enough, understands the sort of balance a film like November Man clumsily grabs it. We’re given our motivation, our villain, our ultra-violence, and little else. All in tidy fashion, all just the right amount.

All in exact proportion, the film has an uncanny sense of what doesn’t matter. The Equalizer asks you to invest in Mr. McCall’s mission via a character—Teri as played by the ascending Chloe G. Moretz—who we see for maybe four minutes. Our villain, Martin Csokas, we know better, and not by much. But the scenes where these characters lay their cards out for one another, the engine hums with the same certainty as it does during outrageous ass kickery. Sewn together with deft touches of dialogue and decent book references turned framing device, The Equalizer casts a shadow without the gaudy action pieces.

But let’s not overlook gaudy action pieces. I’d never tell tales out of school, but I feel obligated to articulate my reaction and my lingering impressions. My reaction, once the fisticuffs hit a rolling boil, was a gleeful giggling, “Whhhaaaatttttt?!?!?” I’m not sure how that’s supposed to look as decided by MLA standards, but it’s the only way a man knows how to say a thing. “Whhhhaaaatttt?!?!” 

The fight sequences are tight, savage, well-choreographed, and deeply satisfying. My favorite wrinkle? Mr. McCall rarely uses guns because, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” ‘Real’ men kill with their bare hands. You want these one dimensional baddies to be run through, and Denzel lives up to the task with tangible zeal. After I left the theater, lingering in a mist of blood and slo-mo rain, it occurred to me what the writer had accomplished. He thought to himself, “You know, if you had to fuck up a whole grip of dudes—and make it, like, awesome—THIS would be the place.” And he takes us there. He takes us deep down into that black and blue Promised Land.

The Equalizer is crazy good fun. I could sit here and bemoan what we all already know about this picture, but the movie deserves better. Because there is really only one thing we definitively know: The Equalizer is a moving picture show. And it’s so good at just that, a celebration is in order. 

—Monte Monreal

0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008

    Categories

    All
    Austin Film Festival
    Darcie Duttweiler Reviews
    Derrick Mitcham Reviews
    Eric Harrelson Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Eric Pulsifer Reviews
    Fantastic Fest
    Greg Maclennan Reviews
    Greg Wilson Reviews
    Jessica Hixson Reviews
    Mark Collins Reviews
    Monte Monreal Reviews
    Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Rob Heidrick Reviews
    Sxsw

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.