<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="weebly" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >

<channel><title><![CDATA[The Movie Press  - Movie Reviews]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/index.html]]></link><description><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:06:20 -0800</pubDate><generator>Weebly</generator><item><title><![CDATA[“The Dictator” recalls a time when Ali G reigned supreme]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/the-dictator-recalls-a-time-when-ali-g-reigned-supreme.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/the-dictator-recalls-a-time-when-ali-g-reigned-supreme.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:12:48 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/the-dictator-recalls-a-time-when-ali-g-reigned-supreme.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       Good "clever" comedic writing isn&rsquo;t easy, but I&rsquo;d be willing to wager that writing good l"ow-brow" comedy is even mo [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/5645988_orig.jpeg" alt="The Dictator" style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style='text-align:left;'>Good "clever" comedic writing isn&rsquo;t easy, but I&rsquo;d be willing to wager that writing good l"ow-brow" comedy is even more difficult. Granted, I&rsquo;m pretty lousy at gambling &mdash; I owe my roommate $10 for a lost bet that Blue October was to blame for the 1995 hit &ldquo;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakfast_at_Tiffany%27s_%28song%29" target="_blank" title="">Breakfast at Tiffany&rsquo;s</a>&rdquo; (turns out it was Deep Blue Something, another Texas band with the color blue in the name). But consider the fine line walked between a simple fart joke and a memorable one like <em>Dumb and Dumber</em> or <em>Bridesmaids</em>.<br /><br />Or, consider the least known of Sacha Baron Cohen&rsquo;s films, 2003&rsquo;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_G_Indahouse" target="_blank" title=""><em>Ali G Indahouse</em></a>, the first scripted Ali G movie and one that is not particularly funny or what some people might call &ldquo;good.&rdquo; (<em>Indahouse</em> is the only other SBC film besides <em>The Dictator</em> to not be done in mockumentary style. It&rsquo;s also 90 minutes of proof that waiting a few years to get Ali G in the States courtesy of HBO was worth it considering the U.S. version of&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Ali_G_Show" target="_blank" title=""><em>Da Ali G Show</em></a> was sans scripted skits.)&nbsp;<br /><br />There was a time when I could think of few people funnier than Mr. SBC; then he gave us&nbsp;<em>Br&uuml;no</em>.<br /><br />Fortunately, <em>The Dictator</em> proves there are some signs of life for SBC in a post-Ali G world, which is a relief as Ali G and the two other quirky characters from his eponymous TV series, Borat and Br&uuml;no, have been retired. Dictator Admiral General Aladeen may be the weakest of SBC&rsquo;s characters thus far but still provides a vessel for delivering outrageous&nbsp;material, the best of which comes thanks to some incredible wingman work from Jason Mantzoukas (<a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/185568/the-league-and-thats-how-rafi-works" target="_blank" title="">Rafi</a> from FX&rsquo;s <em>The League</em>). When the two are going back and forth it makes for the film&rsquo;s funniest moments.&nbsp;<br /><br />The laughs take a bit to get going, but once<em> The Dictato</em>r hits its raucous high point (with a woman giving birth in a grocery store) there&rsquo;s enough delightfully shocking, brilliantly stupid and oh-so-right offensive moments to keep the laughs coming.<br /><br />Those not amused by SBC's hijinks from his Ali G days will have similar complaints here. "Is he drawing awareness to sensitive subjects or making light of them?"&nbsp;It's the type of heavy question that caused Dave Chappelle to leave his show and causes uptight critics to toss around words and phrases like "<a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/movies/the-dictator-with-sacha-baron-cohen.html" target="_blank" title="">misogyny</a>" or "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/the-dictator,1178988/critic-review.html#reviewNum1" target="_blank" title="">too soon</a>" instead of answering the only question that matters in comedy: Is it funny?<br /><br />If you consider yourself sensitive, there's plenty in&nbsp;<em>The Dictator</em>&nbsp;that may offend or outrage, and for you, the answer to that simple question may very well be no.&nbsp;At it's worse,&nbsp;<em>The Dictator</em>&nbsp;feels reminiscent of a bad <span style="font-style: italic;">SNL</span> movie with a handful of rape jokes added in. But, at times, it brings back fond memories of Sunday nights spent watching HBO &mdash; a simpler day when <em>The Wire</em> was still on the air and <em>Entourage</em> was just a bad idea bouncing around in Marky Mark's head.<br /><br />While <em>The Dictator</em> appears to be about 99 percent scripted, there is at least one brief scene where SBC talks to an unwitting extra or two on the streets of New York. And, some of the exchanges between characters &mdash; particularly SBC and Mantzoukas &mdash; feel at least partially ad libbed.&nbsp;Though <em>The Dictator</em> is missing the kind of back and forth between comedian and oblivious interviewee that made Ali G so magical, a majority of what made that so memorable was SBC knowing how to ask the right questions. It&rsquo;s clear that SBC still has a few tricks up his sleeve to delight and disgust, even if he&rsquo;s not making celebrities look like fools while the audience squirms in their seats.<br /><br />--Eric Pulsifer</div>  <div><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[“Dark Shadows” is a movie for strange teenage girls]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/dark-shadows-is-a-movie-for-strange-teenage-girls.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/dark-shadows-is-a-movie-for-strange-teenage-girls.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 07:52:23 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/dark-shadows-is-a-movie-for-strange-teenage-girls.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       The way I feel about Tim Burton movies is not so unlike the way I feel about vanilla ice cream. It&rsquo;s not bad, but I know w [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/1567910_orig.jpeg" alt="Dark Shadows" style="width:100%;max-width:502px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style='text-align:left;'>The way I feel about Tim Burton movies is not so unlike the way I feel about vanilla ice cream. It&rsquo;s not bad, but I know what it&rsquo;s going to taste like, and I feel like if I&rsquo;m going to waste the waist space on frozen creamy goodness it should have some candy bars or molten chocolate or coffee beans or crazy jazz in it. Even when vanilla ice cream is really good &mdash; Mexican vanilla with little bits of vanilla bean in it &mdash; it&rsquo;s still vanilla ice cream. In this way, <em>Dark Shadows</em> is a familiar thing. Not bad, but not particularly exciting. Not exactly funny, scary or dramatic. Slightly campy and a tad creepy. (I&rsquo;ve moved on from talking about ice cream now.)<br /><br /><em>Dark Shadows</em> is based on the &lsquo;60s soap opera of the same name. Johnny Depp plays Barnabas, a wealthy playboy from the 1700s who crosses a witch, who in turn transforms him into a vampire and buries him alive, where he remains undisturbed for 200 years. He is inadvertently freed in 1972 and returns to his former estate to check up on his descendants and the town his family built.<br /><br />Assuming that the words pouring into your eye holes right now are being consumed to help you decide whether or not to see this film, I&rsquo;ve decided to introduce someone who sees Burton flicks as more of a chocolate ice cream. (Back to dessert again. I know &mdash; I&rsquo;ve got a problem.) Hopefully this vanilla-chocolate swirl will help with your movie-going decision making. And with that, I humbly submit for your reader&rsquo;s consideration this real post-viewing conversation.<br /><br /><strong>Johnny Depp gets creepy, goth teenage girls, Andy Warhol, <em>Downton Abbey</em> and more after the jump!</strong><br /></div>  <div><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  <div>  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div class="paragraph" style='text-align:left;'>Me: Favorite Tim Burton film?<br /><br />Her: [Pauses for a moment.] I&rsquo;m going to name a few.<br /><br />Me: No. The first one that comes to mind.<br /><br />Her: <em>Edward Scissorhands</em>.<br /><br />Me: Fair enough. Would you say in general that you like Tim Burton movies?<br /><br />Her: Mm-hmm. I like Tim Burton movies a lot.<br /><br />Me: How about your favorite Johnny Depp movie?<br /><br />Her: [Long pause. She scrapes at a bowl of popcorn and smiles.] What if I said<em> Sleepy Hollow</em>? How mad would you be? [She laughs; I shake my head in disapproval. She turns to the Internet.] Ohh... he was really good in <em>Blow</em>. <em>Donnie Brasco</em> maybe? <em>What&rsquo;s Eating Gilbert Grape</em>. Oh! Or <em>Fear and Loathing</em>... [This continues on for some time but I stopped typing.]<br /><br />Me: So you don&rsquo;t have one favorite?<br /><br />Her: I liked him in <em>Finding Neverland</em>, too... I don&rsquo;t have a favorite.<br /><br />Me: How would you say <em>Dark Shadows</em> compared to your expectations based off previews and other pre-release materials you&rsquo;d seen?<br /><br />Her: It exceeded my expectations. I thought the previews made it look more like a comedy, and I&rsquo;m glad it wasn&rsquo;t just a comedy.<br /><br />Me: So you think it was a comedy though?<br /><br />Her: It was a... dramedy.<br /><br />Me: How&rsquo;s that though? <br /><br />Her: It felt to me like <em>Death Becomes Her</em>, and that&rsquo;s considered a comedy &mdash; a dark comedy maybe. But [<em>Dark Shadows</em> is] not really that dark. It reminded me of Warhol&rsquo;s movies of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_for_Dracula" title=""><em>Dracula</em></a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol%27s_Frankenstein" title=""><em>Frankenstein</em></a>. They just end up being funny. One of my favorite parts was when [Depp] pops up out of the grave and [spoiler removed]... That was laugh-out-loud funny.<br /><br />Me: I&rsquo;m not going to the ruin that bit for anyone. Let&rsquo;s get more broad here. What did you think of Johnny Depp?<br /><br />Her: I thought he was excellent. I liked the attention to detail with his makeup and costuming. Giving him long fingers made him look creepy, but he wasn&rsquo;t really. He was only drinking blood because he needs it. Also, he looks this way, but no one is scared of him either. It was this juxtaposition of expectations. <br /><br />Me: What about the other characters? At about a quarter of the way through the movie, Depp&rsquo;s love interest disappears...<br /><br />Her: She&rsquo;s busy being a governess. She&rsquo;s there to do a job. [She is hired to work at Barnabas' family manor to watch after a troubled child.] We&rsquo;re not going to watch her do her job, are we?<br /><br />Me: Ha &mdash; but we never see any kind of relationship between them. It all happens off camera. Just all of a sudden they&rsquo;re in love with each other and I don&rsquo;t know why [other than the fact that the girl bares a resemblance to Barnabas' dead wife, which just feels kind of wrong] or if I should care [I don&rsquo;t].<br /><br />Her: That&rsquo;s true. Maybe that was a bit disappointing.<br /><br />Me: Looking at the first reviews that are out on this &mdash; a majority of them aren&rsquo;t exactly kind. <br /><br />Her: Are you going to have me respond to their reviews?<br /><br />Me: No, I don&rsquo;t want to do that. Some of their arguments are pretty good; I&rsquo;m not sure how you&rsquo;d be able to come back against them.<br /><br />Her: &ldquo;Shut up. I love this movie.&rdquo;<br /><br />Me: That's actually a brilliant response. But, if someone hears this movie is kind of weak, what would you say to them? Why is this movie not terrible?<br /><br />Her: I think it&rsquo;s for people who are fans of kitsch &mdash; if you appreciate movies that you can laugh at the type of movies they are. It&rsquo;s not for you if you take vampires really seriously or want a romantic comedy in the traditional sense &mdash; it&rsquo;s for people who like things a little off. I feel like the people who like this are in on a joke that other people don&rsquo;t get. It&rsquo;s there, you just have to look for it. It won&rsquo;t be for everybody.<br /><br />Me: So you would say that people should go see this movie?<br /><br />Her: I would say that <em>some</em> people should go see this movie.<br /><br />Me: What people is that?<br /><br />Her: Teenage girls...<br /><br />Me: Wait. You know not all or most &mdash; or really <em>any</em> &mdash; teenage girls are like how you were? [I&rsquo;ll spare the gory details, but let&rsquo;s just say she had a bit of what mainstream folks would call a "goth" phase. She also really loves <em>The Crow</em>.]<br /><br />Her: If you liked <em>The Crow</em>... Did you ever see <em>Death Becomes Her</em>? I loved that movie. I rented it like eight times. It&rsquo;s got that same feeling to me. I thought that movie was hilarious. Not in the subject matter; I haven&rsquo;t seen it in years so maybe I&rsquo;m misremembering it, but it&rsquo;s the way they treat death I suppose.<br /><br />Me: I see<br /><br />Her: Also, here&rsquo;s my biggest&nbsp;unresolved&nbsp;question: How is he actually related to those people [who live in his former estate]? He didn&rsquo;t have kids. He didn&rsquo;t have siblings. He and his family move over from Liverpool and start this business, but he doesn&rsquo;t have any relatives.<br /><br />Me: What about cousins? I&rsquo;m sure there were other relatives. When he died, the estate went to an heir. I thought you understood how this worked now because of <em>Downton Abbey</em>. <br /><br />Her: I&rsquo;m glad you&rsquo;re bringing up <em>Downton Abbey</em>.<br /><br />Me: My pleasure. Maybe 40 years from now, Tim Burton and Johnny Depp can team up to redo <em>Downton Abbey</em> as a movie. <br /><br />Her: They&rsquo;ll be really old by then.<br /><br />Me: I could see Depp as the Dowager Countess.<br /><br />--Eric Pulsifer<br /></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Everything you need to know before “The Avengers”]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/everything-you-need-to-know-before-the-avengers.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/everything-you-need-to-know-before-the-avengers.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:40:54 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/05/everything-you-need-to-know-before-the-avengers.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       Hands down, Joss Whedon&rsquo;s The Avengers is the best movie to come out of a Marvel [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/264637437.jpg" alt="The Avengers film" style="width:100%;max-width:700px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div class="paragraph" style='text-align:left;'>Hands down, Joss Whedon&rsquo;s <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers </span>is the best movie to come out of a Marvel comic. It&rsquo;s not brilliant, but it&rsquo;s mighty entertaining. And, dammit if Whedon (<span style="font-style: italic;">Buffy, Firefly, Dr. Horrible</span>) doesn&rsquo;t make it hard to hate him. His fingerprints are all over this epic superhero tale with an ensemble cast of superheroes, and you&rsquo;ll love him for it. As goofy as the action and actors on the screen should be, each character &mdash; even the crap ones like Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) &mdash; feel real, likable and relatable. The dialogue and the action is sharp and often funny bordering on hilarious.<br /><br />A handful of Marvel films over the past five years back have paved the way for <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span>. Whether you&rsquo;re just getting into the universe now or need a brief refresher, here&rsquo;s a (mostly) spoiler-free recap of what came before.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Thor</span> &mdash; The god of thunder lives with his dad/king Odin in a galaxy where science has become so advanced there is no discernible difference between technology and magic. (Plus, <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heimdall_%28comics%29#Film">Stringer Bell</a> is still alive.) Thor (Chris Hemsworth), the heir to the throne, gets exiled to Earth thanks to his jerk-hole adopted brother, Loki (Tom Hiddleston). Thor bumps into and befriends a group of scientists (Natalie Portman, Kat Dennings and Stellan Skarsg&aring;rd). Quickly learning the ways of our planet, Thor takes up the goal of every Earth male and attempts to bed Natalie Portman. Back in bizarro space world, Loki tries to do bad stuff and Thor stops him. Along the way we get our first peek at the definitely-not-a-real-super hero Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), an archer who plays a big role in <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span>. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it? </span>Sure, but is it necessary? Depends. It does lay the groundwork for The Avengers main nemesis Loki, but it&rsquo;s nothing the uninitiated won&rsquo;t be able to follow.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Captain America: The First Avenger</span> &mdash; Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) is a scrawny, Small Town, USA, kid determined to serve his country in World War II. While he&rsquo;s barely strong enough to hold up a rifle, his quick wits and ferocious loyalty make him the perfect candidate for a secret U.S. super soldier program. He gets strong, gets an indestructible shield from Iron Man&rsquo;s pops, takes out some Nazis and steals their <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCosmic_Cube&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGT3P1U_cSj_Sl8tZmXbxxIXIcUkA">magical space cube</a>, which is later recovered by the senior Stark. Things go down, and Rogers wakes up 70 years later, where Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson)&nbsp; tells him he has a job for him. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it?</span> Do it. It&rsquo;s good all-American fun and basically ends where <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span> starts off.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Iron Man </span>&mdash; Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.) is a smart-ass,, over-sexed billionaire genius &mdash; think a less emo Bruce Wayne/Batman &mdash; who creates a robot suit and becomes Iron Man. He has a magnet in his chest that keeps shrapnel in his blood stream from hitting his heart and killing him. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it? </span>Hell yes. <span style="font-style: italic;">Iron Man</span> is the stuff of summer blockbuster gold.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Iron Man 2</span> &mdash; We pick up where the first film left off: Tony Stark announcing to the world he&rsquo;s Iron Man, but now, instead of being all fun and super-cool, he&rsquo;s just a whiny prick who drinks too much. The Black Widow is an undercover S.H.I.E.L.D. agent who poses as Stark&rsquo;s assistant. Stark cleans up his act and saves the day, but he hears from Nick Fury that he isn&rsquo;t making the cut for S.H.I.E.L.D.&rsquo;s superhero team. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it?</span> Nope. Even RDJ&rsquo;s charm, the addition of Don Cheadle and a bunch of shiny special effects can save this sorry excuse for a sequel.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer</span> &mdash; There&rsquo;s a minor connection to <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers </span>here with a bunch of the trippy space crap that Marvel did in the &lsquo;60s: Silver Surfer and Galactus, who appears in this &mdash; the worst (or second worst if you want to pull the <span style="font-style: italic;">Ghost Rider</span> card) of the worst Marvel comic book films &mdash; as a cloud. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it?</span> Dear me, no. This is a connection that will probably remain unconnected in the Marvel film universe.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">The Hulk</span> &mdash; Ang Lee&rsquo;s take on the not-so-jolly green giant was pretty much universally (probably more so than is deserved, really) hated. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it?</span> Egh... And there&rsquo;s no good reason to if you&rsquo;re prepping for <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span>. The only bits of Hulk backstory relevant to <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers </span>are in 2008&rsquo;s<span style="font-style: italic;"> The Incredible Hulk</span>, which rebooted the character for the current Marvel film universe.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">The Incredible Hulk</span> &mdash; Just five years after Ang Lee&rsquo;s take, we get an lighter reboot of the Hulk. Here, we learn the Hulk is born out of a military experiment to create a super solider. Living in hiding, Banner struggles to control the Hulk through meditation. Important note: When he turns all big and green, he&rsquo;s not just strong &mdash; he has limitless physical strength. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Should you watch it? </span>If you like seeing Hulk smash shit, go for it. It&rsquo;s big and dumb and there&rsquo;s not much you need to know here for <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span> unless you want to see how Norton stacks up to his Hulk replacement Mark Ruffalo. (Ruffalo is way better.)<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Everything else Marvel-ous </span>&mdash; While they could very easily be made to fit in the same world, there&rsquo;s no explicit connections made to <span style="font-style: italic;">X-Men, Spider-Man, Daredevil, </span>or any of the other <a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FList_of_films_based_on_Marvel_Comics&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGRh0sjbMprJ94QA3PjLMLXLWkKlw">Marvel properties turned into films.</a><br /><br />So there you have it. That&rsquo;s everything you could possibly need to know. Now go see <span style="font-style: italic;">The Avengers</span>. It&rsquo;s as good as superhero movies get this side of <span style="font-style: italic;">The Dark Knight</span>.<br /><br />--Eric Pulsifer</div>  <div><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there life on mars? “John Carter” doesn’t quite count]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/03/is-there-life-on-mars-john-carter-doesnt-quite-count.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/03/is-there-life-on-mars-john-carter-doesnt-quite-count.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:20:45 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/03/is-there-life-on-mars-john-carter-doesnt-quite-count.html</guid><description><![CDATA[                           Look, I love an epic picture as much as the next person. Am I a sci fi geek? Nope. But ca [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/979854454.jpg" alt="John Carter" style="width:100%;max-width:574px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">                    Look, I love an epic picture as much as the next person. Am I a sci fi geek? Nope. But can I enjoy a great action adventure flick? Sure. Maybe I turned my nose up a bit at <em style="">Avatar</em>, and of course the <em style="">Star Wars</em> prequels were not great for me. But I&rsquo;m not a snob here. This is the same lady who can enjoy the <em style="">Crank</em> movies for what they are--fun and batshit crazy. <br /> <br /> But for <em style="">John Carter</em>, whose pedigree is so grand with the likes of Andrew Stanton, one of the best Pixar director/contributor ever, and the author of the original <em style="">Tarzan</em> stories, Edgar Rice Burroughs, none of this adds up to much except a whole lotta bloat. I even love Taylor Kitsch&rsquo;s Tim Riggins from <em style="" "mso-bidi-font-style:="">Friday Night Lights</em>. So, where did it all go wrong? I dunno. Somewhere... <br /> <br /> <em style="">John Carter</em> starts off kinda confusing. So pay attention there. Eventually we&rsquo;re taken to a flashback to just after the Civil War, where John Carter, an ex-Confederate Soldier, is looking for gold in the Arizona desert. Through some sort of scuffle involving Bryan Cranston, some Native Americans, and a weirdly dressed dude in a cave, John Carter is magically transported to Mars, or as the natives call it, Barsoom. <br /> <br /> On Barsoom, John Carter (I don&rsquo;t know why I&rsquo;m ingrained to say his full name, just go with it) realizes he can jump really far. That&rsquo;s about it. Oh, and he realizes that he inadvertently gets in the middle of some Barsoomian Civil War between the Heliumites and the Zodangans, whose leader (Dominic West) is destroying all he sees unless the Heliumite princess, Dejah Thoris (Lynne Collins), marries him. Amongst all the warring, weird Na&rsquo;vi-like creatures, the Tharks try to stay out of all the human fighting and partake in their own weird rituals that end up involving John Carter. <br /> <br /> I know Burroughs wrote the <em style="">John Carter</em> books in 1912, long before George Lucas and John Cameron created their sci fi opuses, but the movie Stanton has created can&rsquo;t help but feel like a total rip-off of better movies. And while the action sequences are generally pretty well shot, all the CGI is just too MUCH. It feels way too fake that you kinda distance yourself from the film because you can&rsquo;t feel THAT invested about it. Except, fine, I even liked Woola, the weird, alien, cat-dog thing. Because I&rsquo;m a sucker...<br /> <br /> The acting is fine and all if maybe perhaps a smidgen wooden by Kitsch, especially when he inexplicably falls in love with the princess, but <em style="">John Carter</em> just can&rsquo;t measure up to more than some action scenes and overly fake CGI, unless you enjoy really slutty wedding gowns... And, in the end, much like my reaction to John Carter&rsquo;s new jumping ability, you can&rsquo;t help but say, &ldquo;Is THAT all there is?&rdquo; <br /> <br /> -- Darcie Duttweiler<br />      </div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[“Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” brings the heartbreak just in time for Oscar]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/01/extremely-loud-and-incredibly-close-brings-the-heartbreak-just-in-time-for-oscar.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/01/extremely-loud-and-incredibly-close-brings-the-heartbreak-just-in-time-for-oscar.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:48:28 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2012/01/extremely-loud-and-incredibly-close-brings-the-heartbreak-just-in-time-for-oscar.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       Chances are you&rsquo;ve already made up your mind about whether or not you&rsquo;ll see Extremely Loud [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-none " style="padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/5654646_orig.jpeg" alt="Picture" style="width:100%;max-width:1100px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Chances are you&rsquo;ve already made up your mind about whether or not you&rsquo;ll see <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em>.&nbsp;Like so many films framing fictional tales around real-life tragedies past, it could be argued a movie centered around the events of Sept. 11 is going to be at best a tacky melodrama and at worst an exploitative venture that cashes in on very real sorrow and the deaths of 3,000 innocent people.&nbsp;<br /><br />In this case, the movie is based off the book of the same name by Jonathan Safran Foer (<em>Everything is Illuminated</em>), who, coincidentally, like director Stephen Daldry (<em>The Reader, The Hours</em>), has a previous work rooted in another sorrowful bit of history &mdash; the Holocaust.<br /><br /><em>ELIC</em> is a tale (heavily) narrated by 10-year-old Oskar Schell (Thomas Horn), whose father (Tom Hanks) died on &ldquo;the worst day.&rdquo; (Though narration is the go-to easy-way out for working the best parts of a book into a film adaptation, it's hard to fault Daldry for the tactic when faced with a collection of words as potent as Foer's)&nbsp;Desperately attempting to make sense of his father&rsquo;s death and coping with the expanding gulf of time separating him from the memory of his father, Oskar embarks on a nearly impossible quest to unlock the meaning of a key left behind by his father and a lost and mostly forgotten sixth borough of New York.<strong>&nbsp;</strong><br /><br /><strong>Continued after the jump.</strong></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">There&rsquo;s little about <em>ELIC</em> that should interest me. I&rsquo;ve had more than my share of 9/11 films, and I can hardly stomach Sandra Bullock or child actors in dramas, but my skepticism began to fade as Oskar&rsquo;s journey unfolds. By the time we meet The Renter, a mute elderly man marvelously played by <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=Max+von+Sydow&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=imvnsuo&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=isch&amp;ei=F94YT_PKO8mIsQL7zumiCw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=mode_link&amp;ct=mode&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CBcQ_AUoAQ&amp;biw=1098&amp;bih=644" title="" target="_blank">Max von Sydow</a>, I gave up on feeling above <em>ELIC</em>&rsquo;s blatant tearjerkery, falling for Oskar&rsquo;s awkwardness and Aspergerian attempts to map and chart his way through the sadness.<br /><br />Beyond the occasional cheap ploys to cue the waterworks, which, judging from the sounds of sniffling in my screening, were largely effective, and the fleeting feeling there&rsquo;s not much to the story, <em>ELIC</em> delivers some genuinely wonderful, raw and sad moments, beautiful visuals of heartbreak as we jump back and forth through time &mdash; before, during and after the day. <br /><br />Oskar obsesses over a photo from the newspaper, wanting to see his father in the pixelated picture of a man falling from the towers and pours over his father&rsquo;s final words. Silently, the Renter pleads for the boy to stop, saying it&rsquo;s too painful.&nbsp;It would be understandable for audiences to feel the same way or to take issue with someone repackaging our agony into a 120-minute nasal decongestant strategically released <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/09/movies/awardsseason/scott-rudin-holds-oscar-cards-close-with-extremely-loud.html" target="_blank">just in time for a different Oscar</a>, but <em>ELIC</em> somehow never feels intentionally exploitative.<br /><br />We end up, kind of obviously, seeing how the sorrow of the day turned strangers into neighbors and with as life-affirming a message as we could hope to take away from a film based on senseless death and chaos. That's not enough to change the way you remember Sept. 11, but it's probably enough to earn <em>ELIC </em>a couple of gold statues come February.<br /><br />--Eric Pulsifer</div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mission: Possible--make Tom Cruise likable and up the ante on a franchise]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/mission-possible-make-tom-cruise-likable-and-up-the-ante-on-a-franchise.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/mission-possible-make-tom-cruise-likable-and-up-the-ante-on-a-franchise.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:08:22 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/mission-possible-make-tom-cruise-likable-and-up-the-ante-on-a-franchise.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       _You remember the &lsquo;90s when the Missi [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/870140896.jpg" alt="Picture" style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span>You remember the &lsquo;90s when the<span style="font-style: italic;"> Mission: Impossible</span> movies were wildly popular? And then Tom Cruise went all nutso, but JJ Abrams decided to reboot the franchise anyway (and bring in <span style="font-style: italic;">Felicity </span>herself), and it was actually really good? Well, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Incredibles</span> director Brad Bird decided he was going to top all of those.<br /><br />No, really.<br /><br /><span></span><span style="font-style: italic;">Mission: Impossible--Ghost Protocol</span> decided to go above and beyond any badass action sequences that any of the previous <span style="font-style: italic;">Mission: Impossible</span> films have done before it. And do it in IMAX. I know I&rsquo;m sounding hyperbolic here, and I went full in expecting to have a good time, but I really didn&rsquo;t expect to be completely blown away by how over-the-top (in a good way) this film is. Some of the stuff they do is fucking bananas.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">READ MORE AFTER THE JUMP.</span><br /></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; ">Granted, all that being said, I wish I had gone back and rewatched the third film because I could barely remember Ethan Hunt&rsquo;s (Tom Cruise) wife. Shame on me, I suppose. Anyhoo, <span style="font-style: italic;">Ghost Protocol</span> opens with Benji (Simon Pegg) and Agent Jane Carter (Paula Patton) breaking Ethan out of a Russian prison. No one knows why he&rsquo;s there, but all they know is that they need him to try to break into the Kremlin to find a file. When that mission goes awry, the IMF is implicated in a terrorist plot and Ghost Protocol is initiated--that is, the company is completely shut down. So if Ethan and his team want to clear their names, they must act completely alone, without any help from the IMF and totally off grid. Along for the ride is analyst Brandt (Jeremy Renner).<br /><br />There is, of course, a real terrorist plot involving some Russian psycho who wants to start a nuclear war, and the team must stop him, at all costs. Which involves jumping into a 10-story shaft, climbing up the world&rsquo;s tallest building with special gloves that stick to glass, and running through a crazy sandstorm. <span style="font-style: italic;">Ghost Protocol</span> has some of the most insane, bat shit crazy action sequences I have ever seen. It&rsquo;s like Bird took all of his fun, animated action scenes from his previous films and was like, &ldquo;let&rsquo;s bring that shit to life.&rdquo; And he does. The spectacle of Cruise slowly climbing the Burj Khalifa is a sight unto itself. Do yourself a favor and go see it in IMAX. Another incredibly artful sequence is a fight scene that takes place on a multi-level automated parking garage with multiple levers moving cars to and fro. It&rsquo;s almost like an action ballet it&rsquo;s that artful.<br /><br />Because of Pegg, <span style="font-style: italic;">Ghost Protocol</span> also has some fairly funny moments, too. But, perhaps Renner is the most welcome surprise in that department, as the two have a very humorous scene debating how a particular part of the mission will play out. Cruise&rsquo;s own personal gravitas work here because they lend Ethan an air of &ldquo;what, me worry?&rdquo; that make all the stunts extraordinary.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Mission: Impossible--Ghost Protoco</span>l may be one of the best action films in recent years. It&rsquo;s fun and inventive. Its cast is likable, even megalomaniac Tom Cruise. And the addition of director Brad Bird has pushed the film into a dazzling arena. Just make sure you don't next to someone who likes to exclaim, "HOLY SHIT! Did you just see that?" Because you'll be hearing it a lot. <br /><br />--Darcie Duttweiler<br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA["Sherlock Holmes:" A Plot of Jumbles ]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/sherlock-holmes-a-plot-of-jumbles.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/sherlock-holmes-a-plot-of-jumbles.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:33:36 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/12/sherlock-holmes-a-plot-of-jumbles.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       __The first Guy Ritchie-directed  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/514752577.jpg" alt="Picture" style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span><span style="display:none;">_</span>The first Guy Ritchie-directed <span style="font-style: italic;">Sherlock Holmes</span> installment didn&rsquo;t really do it for me. I thought the plot was completely jumbled and too much for the likable cast to overcome. However, I could recognize that the film definitely had a lot of great things going for it: namely the chemistry between Holmes (Robert Downy Jr.) and Watson (Jude Law) and the frenetic directing and fight choreography of Ritchie. I could buy that this Holmes was a martial arts master because of the slow-mo fight scenes where he deduces his opponent&rsquo;s moves. But I couldn&rsquo;t buy that awful plot.<br /><br />For <span style="font-style: italic;">Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows</span>, I felt myself more willing to go along for the ride, especially due to the addition of Moriarity (Jared Harris), who gives Holmes a greater intellectual match. However, the sequel still cannot overcome its jumbled plot, but it still becomes a fun movie because of the sum of its parts.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">A Game of Shadows</span> follows Holmes as he tries to solve the cause for several bombings in Europe, which are being pinned on an extremist Anarchist group. He believes they are the product of mastermind Moriarty, but he cannot figure out what his evil nemesis is up to. Along for the ride is, of course, Watson, who is trying to embark on his honeymoon without getting killed, Holmes&rsquo; brother, Mycroft (Stephen Fry), and a mysterious gypsy (Noomi Rapace) who is trying to figure out how her brother is involved in all the bombings.<br /><br />That&rsquo;s the plot boiled down to the simplest I can. There is a whole bunch of Victorian-era politics that predate World War I that I was trying to follow, but it&rsquo;s mainly best to just sit back and watch Downey, Ritchie, and Holmes do what they do best, which is to make you laugh, show some badass fight scenes, and solve some mother effin&rsquo; crimes. But is is the addition of Moriarty (and Harris) that give the film any sense of weight. He is the true foe of Holmes, and he tones down all the adrenaline rush of the action sequences.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows</span> isn&rsquo;t the most spectacular of films, but it plays on the strengths of everyone involved, and it entertains despite a bogged down plot.<br /><br />--Darcie Duttweiler<br /></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA["Hugo" is a dream for film buffs]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/hugo-is-a-dream-for-film-buffs.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/hugo-is-a-dream-for-film-buffs.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:18:10 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/hugo-is-a-dream-for-film-buffs.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       _You may be scratching your head and wondering, &ldquo;a family movie from Marti [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/718541318.jpg" alt="Hugo " style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span>You may be scratching your head and wondering, &ldquo;a family movie from Martin Scorsese? WTF? The dude who brought me <span style="font-style: italic;">Goodfellas </span>and <span style="font-style: italic;">Taxi Driver</span>? No way!&rdquo; Well, <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>isn&rsquo;t necessarily a children&rsquo;s movie in the same vein as <span style="font-style: italic;">The Muppets</span>, which is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/feel-the-rainbow-connection-with-the-muppets.html">also opening this weekend</a>. It&rsquo;s slower, more methodical, and definitely more beautifully-crafted. Sure, it&rsquo;s about a boy in his quest to uncover a secret, but, more importantly, <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is a film that&rsquo;s meant to be a work of art for those who love movies.<br /><br />At one point, Hugo (Asa Butterfield) takes his new friend Isabelle (Chloe Moretz) to her first movie, and she turns to him and says, &ldquo;Thank you for the movie. It was a gift.&rsquo;&rsquo; <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is Martin Scorsese&rsquo;s gift to cinephiles in that he lovingly recreates many of the very first films ever shown but gives them a 3D makeover. This is one instance where the latest technology really does add to the overall package of a film. <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is a film for dreamers, but more about that <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">after the jump! </span><br /></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span><span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo</span>, the screen adaption of the 2007 YA novel/picture book <span style="font-style: italic;">The Invention of Hugo Cabret</span>, tells the tale of young Hugo who lives alone in the Paris train station in the &lsquo;30s after the death of his father (Jude Law) and the disappearance of his drunk uncle who wound all the station&rsquo;s clocks. In order to avoid being thrown in the orphanage at the hands of the Station Inspector (Sasha Baron Cohen), Hugo climbs through catacombs and hides in the walls while stealing croissants and small gadgets from a toy shop run by Papa George (Sir Ben Kingsley). He uses gears stolen from these toys in order to fix a small mechanical boy that his father was trying to fix shortly before he died. Of course, fixing the machine isn&rsquo;t all that easy because the automaton needs a key in the shape of a heart and Papa George has stolen Hugo&rsquo;s notebook which has helpful instructions from his late father. Along comes Isabelle, Papa George&rsquo;s goddaughter who&rsquo;s longing for adventure, to help Hugo discover the secrets behind the automaton.<br /><br />Of course, Hugo and Isabelle do discover the secret of this machine, which leads them to Papa George&rsquo;s past and offers beautiful glimpses into the early days of filmmaking, including a wonderful 3D adaption of <span style="font-style: italic;">Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat</span> by the Lumiere brothers in which the first film&rsquo;s audience shrieked at the sight of a train coming straight at them. While the loving details to films past and wonderful imagery of dreams and moving pictures is awesome for a devout film buff, I wonder if children would find <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>as beautiful and moving as I did.<br /><br />That being said, <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is one of the best uses of 3D in recent years (notwithstanding the current <span style="font-style: italic;">Harold and Kumar</span> Christmas movie, of course). It is beautifully shot and directed, with gorgeous cinematography. You can practically feel the train&rsquo;s steam in your face, and Paris has never looked so magical. Plus, Scorsese angles for kiddos' attention with Baron Cohen&rsquo;s long nose protruding out of the screen just as far as his trusty canine friend&rsquo;s snout. <span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is a feast for the eyes.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is also incredibly touching with rich characters, even small ones played wonderfully by Christopher Lee, Emily Mortimer, Richard Griffiths, and Helen McCrory. You&rsquo;ll be hard-pressed to not be charmed by Hugo and his cohorts, especially the lovely Moretz.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Hugo </span>is a loving homage to the original filmmakers and is a charming, delightful film that taps into your dreamer side, but I&rsquo;m not sure all the kiddies in the audience will be as dazzled and charmed as the grownups.<br /><br />--Darcie Duttweiler<br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Feel the "Rainbow Connection" again with "The Muppets"]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/feel-the-rainbow-connection-with-the-muppets.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/feel-the-rainbow-connection-with-the-muppets.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:50:10 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/feel-the-rainbow-connection-with-the-muppets.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       _The very first song in The Muppets,  [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/433220498.jpg" alt="The Muppets " style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span>The very first song in <span style="font-style: italic;">The Muppets</span>, Gary (Jason Segel) and his puppet brother Walter sing the lyric, &ldquo;I can&rsquo;t seem to wipe this smile off of my face.&rdquo; If that&rsquo;s not an allusion to how you&rsquo;ll feel the whole movie, then I don&rsquo;t know what is. I loooooooved the Muppets growing up, and it wasn&rsquo;t until that opening number that I realized how much I really missed a great Muppet movie. (Yes, I&rsquo;m discounted Muppets from Space.) Lifelong Muppet-lover Segel and his cohort, which includes Bret McKenzie from <span style="font-style: italic;">Flight of the Conchords</span>, have created a truly magical and fun Muppet movie that will hopefully relaunch the franchise. And it&rsquo;s one of the best movies in a loooong time that&rsquo;s perfect for the whole family.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Muppets</span> follows Walter, his brother Gary, and Gary&rsquo;s gal-pal Mary (Amy Adams) on vacation in Los Angeles as they decide to visit the whole Muppets Studio. There, Walter discovers that evil oil tycoon Tex Richman (Chris Cooper) is going to buy the studio and bulldoze it to drill for oil unless the Muppets can scrounge together $10 million to buy it back. Walter persuades Kermit the Frog to rally the whole Muppet gang back together in order to hold a good ol&rsquo; fashioned telethon to raise the money. Trouble is everyone has gone their separate ways: Miss Piggy is in France working for <span style="font-style: italic;">Vogue</span>, Animal is in anger management therapy, and Gonzo is a huge plumbing magnate. Plus, a TV exec (Rashida Jones) thinks that the Muppets are obsolete and not famous anymore. (How very meta.) So, can Kermit and Walter get the whole gang back together, and can they prove to the world how much everyone needs a little Muppets in their lives?<br /><br />While this could very well sound like the sappiest, lamest movie ever, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Muppets</span> is the perfect mix of sincerity, happiness, and humor. The movie doesn&rsquo;t take itself too seriously, and even offers up classic Muppets meta humor (&ldquo;this is going to be the shortest movie ever&rdquo;). Everything is lighthearted and tongue-in-cheek, but nothing feels too grownup or cynical. Sure there are moments of weight, like when Kermit sings a song about how long it&rsquo;s been since he&rsquo;s seen his friends, and it&rsquo;s downright sad and tear-inducing. But then there are absurd <span style="font-style: italic;">Flight of the Conchords</span>-esque songs like &ldquo;Am I a Man or a Muppet?&rdquo; that are so pitch-perfect and ridiculous that they&rsquo;re an amazing fit with the Muppets world.<br /><br />By the time Kermit sings &ldquo;Rainbow Connection&rdquo; you&rsquo;ll be downright giddy and delirious from smiling so damn much, whether you are a boy or a girl, a kid or an adult, a man or a Muppet. <span style="font-style: italic;">The Muppets</span> might just be one of the best family movies I&rsquo;ve seen in a long time because it made me feel all gooey and fuzzy in my heart. And this is coming from a cynic like me. Do yourself and your family a favor this Thanksgiving and head out to see<span style="font-style: italic;"> The Muppets.&nbsp; </span><br /><br />--Darcie Duttweiler<br /></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA["The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1:" boring and laughably bad]]></title><link><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/the-twilight-saga-breaking-dawn-part-1-boring-and-laughably-bad.html]]></link><comments><![CDATA[http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/the-twilight-saga-breaking-dawn-part-1-boring-and-laughably-bad.html#comments]]></comments><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:57:10 -0800</pubDate><category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2011/11/the-twilight-saga-breaking-dawn-part-1-boring-and-laughably-bad.html</guid><description><![CDATA[       _Watching the opening wedding scene in T [...] ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div ><div class="wsite-image-border-thin " style="padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-align:center"> <a> <img src="http://www.themoviepress.com/uploads/1/0/3/7/1037961/770044012.jpg" alt="Twilight: Breaking Dawn" style="width:100%;max-width:600px" /> </a> <div style="display:block;font-size:90%"></div> </div></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span>Watching the opening wedding scene in <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1</span> is like being a guest at your friend&rsquo;s friends&rsquo; wedding. You don&rsquo;t belong there, and you frankly don&rsquo;t give a shit about the copious amounts of toasts occurring. You just want to get to the free booze and maybe make out with a cute groomsmen on the dance floor. Is that too much to ask for? Yes, yes it is. Because instead of a beautiful film with nuance and complexities and fun, <span style="font-style: italic;">Breaking Dawn</span> is a boring, slow film that is laughably awful at several parts. When will Hollywood understand that splitting a film into two parts is quite possibly the worst idea. It makes for the first half to feel completely unfinished and lacking, not the gripping cliffhanger they (or rather, their pockets) anticipate. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Read more after the jump!</span><br /></div>  <div ><div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div> <hr class="styled-hr" style="width:100%;"></hr> <div style="height: 20px; overflow: hidden; width: 100%;"></div></div>  <div >  <!--BLOG_SUMMARY_END--></div>  <div  class="paragraph editable-text" style=" text-align: left; "><span style="display:none;">_</span>As you may recall from my <a target="_blank" href="http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2010/06/the-action-is-almost-eclipsed-by-cheesy-romance.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">Eclipse </span></a>and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.themoviepress.com/2/post/2009/11/new-moon-has-no-satisfaction.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">New Moon</span></a> reviews, I&rsquo;m not the biggest fan of the <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>franchise. But I&rsquo;m the only writer on this site that actually has a vagina, so I&rsquo;m deemed the designated <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>reviewer. It&rsquo;s not that I can&rsquo;t get behind a cheesy, teen vampire romance. Trust me, I absolutely adore <span style="font-style: italic;">The Vampire Diaries</span>, as silly and guilty pleasure-y as it is. And I&rsquo;ve even TRIED to read the first Twilight book just to see what all the hooplah was about. My problem is this: Stephenie Meyer is a terrible writer. Absolutely fucking awful. And all of the crazy Christian overtones of her books are extremely problematic for me. This all translates to movies with terrible dialogue and lots of longing looks that basically spell out how sex equals death.<br /><br />Plus I think Edward (Robert Pattinson) is creepy as shit. Seriously.<br /><br />Anyhoo. Now that I got that out of the way (why does <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>infuriate me SO MUCH?), on to <span style="font-style: italic;">Breaking Dawn</span>! For those of you who haven&rsquo;t read all the books a bajillion times and wrote about it in your diary, the film picks up where <span style="font-style: italic;">Eclipse </span>left off with Bella (Kristen Stewart) and Edward getting engaged. <span style="font-style: italic;">Breaking Dawn</span> quickly welcomes us to their wedding, where everyone is all smiles except for Jacob (Taylor Launter, doing some REAL ACTING, DAMMIT), who&rsquo;s brooding and all preachy about Bella and Edward not getting it on because he might hurt her (that&rsquo;s what we call a metaphor, folks). Cut to honeymoon, and they do, indeed, do the nasty, and what do you know? Bella totally gets preggers, and because it&rsquo;s a vampire baby, it grows all crazy fast and hurts her.<br /><br />Because this baby is basically a monster, all of wolf pack and the Cullen vampire family are concerned and argue over what to do while Bella refuses an abortion even though it would save her own life (oh, are metaphors too hard to spell out anymore when it comes to abortion, Stephenie Meyer? Get it folks, abortions are bad. Period). I digress. There&rsquo;s lot of scenes of arguing, some bad CGI, some telepathic wolves, lots of brooding, Bella looking all sullen and needing a hairbrush, and that&rsquo;s it really. Because, while yes, we do see the bloody birth, nothing really happens in this film. It&rsquo;s a lot of talking and a lot of Kristen Stewart rubbing her belly because that&rsquo;s what ALL pregnant women do ALL THE TIME.<br /><br />It&rsquo;s difficult to write a <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>review because all the people who are about to camp out for midnight showings could care less what a non-devotee thinks of their precious Bella and Edward. But for me, sitting in the theater about to see <span style="font-style: italic;">The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 </span>gave me the same chills I felt waiting for the Ke$ha concert to start (hey, I got free tickets), which is that I felt scared for the future generation of young girls. But at least Ke$ha is entertaining with her metric tons of glitter. <span style="font-style: italic;">Breaking Dawn</span> is slow, boring, and offers nothing but stilted acting, wooden dialogue, and awful CGI effects.<br /><br />--Darcie Duttweiler <br /></div>  ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>

